12/2/20

40Kriegsspiele

   In ’87 or ’88, one of my AD&D players told me, “There is a new game with no role-play, only miniatures, and the entire table is a battlefield!”

   I was curious.

   Of course, there really wasn’t anything “new” about miniatures wargaming. They’ve been around since the early 1800s under the common name Kriegsspiele.

   From the get-go, I knew it would be an expensive hobby. The price tag for a standard army today is around $600. With magnetization, add another Benjamin or two for those tiny magnets and a half-decent drill. And that cost may have been higher in the eighties, because the figures were all metal. I couldn’t afford any of it.

   The setting didn’t appeal to me all that much, either. Empires and eagles and ginormous plasma guns. It was just too aggressive. I remember walking into the local game store one day and coming face-to-face with this issue of White Dwarf:



   I was rattled. What with all the live, obnoxious skinheads that prowled our streets in friggin’ 1989. Games Workshop didn’t see any problem whatsoever with putting up that kind of artwork on the cover of their magazine? Really?

   Many people have discussed Warhammer’s problematic imagery over the years, and I won’t get into that here. I just want to address the seriousness of it all. For me at least, it all boils down to one simple thing: do I wish I’d be right there in that room with those guys? If the answer is no, well, I won’t play that game.

   I remember seeing pictures of a 40K convention in Greece. It was a huge room full of bald guys dressed in black, with tattoos. I did not want to be there. I don’t have the required clothes, anyway. Wearing all black all the time, for fear of passing for – what? Not serious enough? A noob? Are we still this insecure?

   When I catch an episode of Acquisitions Incorporated, I always want to be sitting at that table with that bunch of lunatics. Every. Single. Time. That’s it. That’s the magic recipe.

   The seriousness I’m talking about stems from competing. 40K ain’t casual: there is a winner, and there is a loser. Even Magic: The Gathering isn’t casual, because there’s a winner. D&D can be taken very seriously, too; but it is – mostly – casual. There are no winners or losers in role-playing games. It makes a big difference.

   I’ll buy one Space Marine and put it in my D&D campaign. He’ll be stranded there in the world of Greyhawk. His powered armor ran out of energy months ago, but he keeps wearing it. And he had to learn how to use a crossbow. It’ll be funny. Especially when he crosses paths with a cowboy from Boot Hill and a Chaotic Good, Drizztian renegade Mind Flayer!

*

   Obviously, avid gamers are gonna get curious from time to time – about other styles of play, alternative mechanics, different settings, and so forth. A year ago, Sly Flourish was pondering “lightweight” game mechanics based “on 2d6.” Well, that is Dave Arneson’s original Blackmoorthe First Fantasy Campaign. They didn’t have funny dice back in 1971, so everything was rolled on 2d6. A 12 was a crit, and a 2 was a fumble. Every once in a while, curious gamers feel the need to return to that. Back to their roots. Curiosity is a good thing. It’s a sign of intelligence.

   Every once in a while, some tabletop gamers, not all of them, but some of them, will want to go back to the basics that is miniatures wargaming. It’s okay. Just know that 40K isn’t the only option.

   Why not go rogue and create your own system? One of my friends did it a few years ago, and I actually blogged about it on here. If you want to read that post, go to the Archives and click on 2015-11-25. Basically, he printed a (very) large color map of a besieged city in his campaign world, created cardstock counters and tokens, and then our regular characters each had to lead a squad of militia and battle the invaders block by block, sometimes house by house. With a DM, the whole thing is less competitive, and much more enjoyable. I recommend it.



   If and when I decide to do something similar, I’m gonna go full H. G. Wells and download Little Wars. Imagine the thrill of playing with wargaming rules that were written in 1913!

   We’re gonna push lead around a table the old-fashioned way.

*

   Saying that “Warhammer is for everyone” is like saying that model trains are for everyone – and, evidently, they are not. Those miniature railroad sets are costly, and it’s a time-consuming hobby. Sure, Games Workshop has hired a media relations manager, and they have to say that. And then, of course, 40K YouTubers will disagree for all the wrong reasons, simply because they don’t want change. It’s the battles you choose to pick that ultimately reveal your true colors.

   Here’s a bit of sage advice that is found in AD&D’s Battlesystem (1985).

Because of the profusion of strange monsters, magic spells, and magical items in both the AD&D and D&D games (and the likelihood of much more to come!), and because of the different playing styles that each player can adopt, it is inappropriate of us to tell you what is the only ‘correct’ way to play.

However, we can tell you that the use of common sense will greatly improve your enjoyment. [...] Of course, there’s nothing to stop you from putting together an arbitrary and silly battle for an evening’s pleasure.



   I think that it validates my whole point, which is: go ahead and play any kind of miniatures wargame, any way you want to play it.

   Teenagers living in war-torn countries can still whip up a game of D&D once in a while, theater of the mind; but they certainly can’t build an entire village with a miniature railroad looping through it. Some hobbies are “for everyone,” and some are for restricted segments of the population. It’s just the way it is. Soccer: accessible. Golf: privileged.

   Kids in Africa desperately want to play soccer, even though they can’t afford a ball, and sometimes, not even shoes. Still, they find something round, locate an area which is relatively flat, and play soccer barefoot. The goaaaaaal here is to play the game, right? Why nobody plays MTG with photocopied cards is beyond me. Maybe the collecting really is more important than the playing itself.

   In D&D, if you want an evening of over the top powergaming, it’s easy enough to set up. Roll a couple level 25 characters, equip them with ultra-powerful magic items, print out Orcus’ stat block and a few hundred zombies, draw a battle map – and go for it.

   In MTG, you can’t.

   In 40K, you can’t.

   You’re a kid in Africa who wants to play soccer, but it’s impossible. Let’s put together a ridiculous battle just for tonight: my Space Wolves against a humongous, 6,000-point Necron army! Let’s see how fast my guys are wiped out!

   But you can’t do it. Your pal Josh only owns a standard Necron army. You would have to find two other guys with similar armies who are willing and able to partake in such madness.

   It’s terrible when games are restrictive like that. Video games, I get it. Tournament games, I understand. But when you’re at home with your friends, what gives? I paid good money for this game; can I please fight Orcus tonight?

   Warhammer, The 9th Age, Frostgrave and other miniatures games are somewhere between D&D and model trains. You can’t just whip up a game for someone’s birthday, and yet it requires less hardware than model trains. It’s not for everyone – but more people can access this hobby than the model train thing. The makers of The 9th Age actually insist that you play with any kind of gaming aid: paper standees, Lego characters, homemade tokens, anything you want. This is definitely cool.

   The 9th Age is a game, not a mammoth line of paint / models / terrain. That is the major difference. As I said, just getting started in 40K will set you back $600 at the very least. One 24ml pot of Nuln Oil is $10. Games Workshop makes most of its money with the hardware that goes in and around the game – not the game itself. In that regard, GW may have more in common with Lego than Chaosium.

   “Hardware” and “game” should be independent from one another, but they should be compatible as well, across the board. I’m pretty sure you can somehow take the hobby of model trains and turn it into something gameable. Make two trains run side by side, crisscrossing the entire basement, add some Car Wars rules and weaponry, and fire away. It could very well be the craziest, whackiest, most memorable wargame ever.

   The opposite is also possible. Take an entirely gameable thing like 40K, add a global pandemic, and it reverts to being just the simple hobby of collecting and painting models in your room, all by yourself.

   It is possible to play miniatures without Warhammer, and it should also be possible to play Warhammer without miniatures. And it is. They call it “Paperhammer,” and it’s great.

*

   So, there you have it. Different people are certainly curious about different things in 40K. The setting. The crafting. The collecting. The competing. The community. It’s all good. If you attend or want to attend tournaments, keep at it, the Emperor needs you. If you want to start collecting, go for it, and make sure to check out Corvus Belli’s store. But if you’re just 40Kurious,” then why not go completely off the rails and create your own fucked-up pharaoh motorcycle Barsoom crossover wargame? You know, like Dave Wesely and M. A. R. Barker – and Gygax – used to do on a weekly basis? There are no rules. The gaming fun ain’t tied up with any specific system or brand. It never was.

   Miniatures wargaming is the mother of tabletop role-playing games, and Warhammer 40,000 is just another iteration of it.


No comments:

Post a Comment